From caver456 at gmail.com Mon Dec 3 13:56:22 2007 From: caver456 at gmail.com (Tom Grundy) Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:56:22 -0800 Subject: [Energy] Fwd: House to vote on historic Energy Bill this week! In-Reply-To: <20071201215610.1141.9993.qmail@omail3.sac.getactive.com> References: <20071201215610.1141.9993.qmail@omail3.sac.getactive.com> Message-ID: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Union of Concerned Scientists Action Network Date: Dec 1, 2007 1:56 PM Subject: House to vote on historic Energy Bill this week! To: Tom Grundy [image: Energy Bill '07: Fuel a Cooler Future] * * *Last Chance! House Set to Vote on Final Energy Bill* Dear Tom, Thanks to almost a year of your emails and calls in support of an Energy Bill that promotes fuel economy and renewable electricity, we are on the cusp of passing a strong, comprehensive energy package that protects consumers and reduces the threat of global warming. Last night the Speaker of the House announced that they will vote this week on an Energy Bill that includes strong standards on fuel economy and renewable electricity. This historic bill will raise fuel economy standards for the first time in 32 years, require electric utilities to obtain more power from clean, renewable sources--such as the wind and sun, and will help reduce America's global warming pollution. *Please urge your representative today to support the energy bill. This is your last chance to contact your representatives about this bill!* Sincerely, Ben Larson and Scott Nathanson National Field Organizers UCS Clean Energy and Clean Vehicles Programs *Subject*: Vote for clean energy and fuel economy Dear Representative, Please protect consumers and reduce the threat of global warming by supporting the Energy Bill when it comes up for a vote. This package includes: - a 15 percent renewable electricity standard, which would save U.S. consumers between $13 billion to $18 billion; and - a strong 35 mpg by 2020 fuel economy standard, which would save consumers an additional $25 billion per year. These initiatives represent real money, real jobs, real global warming pollution reductions, and a real future at a time when we are all suffering from volatile oil prices. Please vote for a strong, clean Energy Bill. I look forward to your reply. Sincerely, Tom Grundy *Take Action!* *Instructions:* Click here to take actionon this issue. *Tell-A-Friend:* Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this. Tell-a-Friend! *Action Update:* Last month, thousands of UCS supporters contacted Toyota urging the corporation to stop undermining congressional action to increase the fuel economy standards of our nation's cars, trucks and SUVs. Now Toyota is responding! Click here to read all about it . *More Information: *This summer, all of us who care about reducing global warming pollution achieved two major milestones: In June the Senate passed an energy bill requiring automobiles go farther on a tank of gas. And in August the House passed an Energy Bill requiring electric utilities to obtain more power from clean, renewable sources?such as the wind and sun. Automakers and utilities fought hard to roll back the accomplishments we achieved this summer. But analysis done by the Union of Concerned Scientists clearly shows that stronger fuel economy and renewable energy standards are not only technologically feasible?but they will save consumers money, create American jobs, and decrease global warming pollution. *Negotiations between House leaders on the fuel economy portions of this bill were successfully completed late on Friday, November 30.* More... ------------------------------ If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for the Union of Concerned Scientists . This message was sent to caver456 at gmail.com. Visit your subscription management pageto update your personal profile. From this page you can change your email address, mailing address, name, congressional districts, email format preference, or add or remove yourself from various UCS newsletters, networks, and mailing lists. To stop receiving UCS Action Network emails, click to unsubscribe. The Union of Concerned Scientists relies on individuals like you to support our research and advocacy. Join us to promote practical, science-based environmental and security solutions. To ensure you continue to receive emails from UCS, be sure to add action at ucsusa.org to your address book. If you have general questions, comments or concerns about this action, send email to ucsaction at ucsusa.org We are committed to protecting your privacy, your email address will NEVER be sold or exchanged. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.apple-nc.org/pipermail/energy/attachments/20071203/a28dcea2/attachment.html From sunwolf at mac.com Sun Dec 16 02:22:14 2007 From: sunwolf at mac.com (Rick Hartmann) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 02:22:14 -0800 Subject: [Energy] Solar is the Solution Message-ID: Solar is the Solution We know that relying on coal, oil and natural gas threatens our future with toxic pollution, global climate change and social unrest caused by diminishing fuel supplies. Instead of relying on unsustainable fossil fuels, we must transform our economy and learn to thrive on the planet?s abundant supply of renewable energy. I have been studying our energy options for more than 30 years, and I am absolutely convinced that our best and easiest option is solar energy, which is virtually inexhaustable. Most importantly, if we choose solar we don?t have to wait for a new technology to save us. We already have the technology and energy resources we need to build a sustainable, solar-electric economy that can cure our addiction to oil, stabilize the climate and maintain our standard of living, all at the same time. It is well past time to start seriously harnessing solar energy. Fossil-fueled Problems Before you read on, take a moment to study the two corresponding pie charts, which compare the Earth?s estimated total reserves of non- renewable energy resources with the annual renewable energy options. You?ll see that the potential of solar energy dwarfs all other options, renewable or otherwise. To understand why a solar-electric economy is our best option, let?s look at the energy resources we currently depend on and compare them with the solar energy available to us. Coal is burned mainly to produce electricity, and coal-fired power plants produce more than half the electricity used in the United States. But burning coal has serious drawbacks. One is that it releases carbon dioxide, which contributes to global warming. It also releases heavy metals, such as mercury and sulfur. These toxins that were locked in the Earth?s crust over billions of years are suddenly spewed into the atmosphere and thus degrade our air, water and soil. The exhaust from burning coal contains more pollutants and global warming emissions per unit of energy produced than any other fossil fuel. In addition, the methods used to mine coal are destructive to the land and dangerous for the miners. Now consider that coal is enormously inefficient from a total energy perspective. It took billions of years of solar energy to form the coal we have today. And while coal is the most abundant fossil resource, the total amount of energy produced by burning all the coal on the planet would only be equivalent to the solar energy that strikes the Earth every six days. Natural gas supplies more than half the fuel used to heat buildings and about 15 percent of the electricity in the United States. Natural- gas-fired power plants only emit about half the pollutants produced by coal plants, as long as the fuel is extracted close to where it is burned. However, U.S. natural gas extraction can no longer keep up with demand, so expensive and hazardous methods to liquefy and ship foreign natural gas are being devised. In the future, natural gas for the United States would have to be imported from countries such as Russia, Kazakhstan, Qatar and Iran, which together have 60 percent of the world?s reserves. When all the externalities, such as the cost and pollution caused by liquefying and transporting this fuel, are included, liquefied natural gas (LNG) is much more expensive than coal, and almost as dirty. Natural gas is the second most abundant fossil fuel, but its total potential energy is equivalent to only about 1 1?2 days of sunshine striking the Earth. Nuclear power plants fueled by radioactive isotopes of uranium produce 20 percent of the electricity used in the United States. When radioactive materials were sequestered and dispersed deep under the Earth?s surface, they presented very little threat to life. But we?ve made those materials far more dangerous by mining and concentrating them, and the byproducts left over after a nuclear reaction are even more dangerous than the original isotopes. Nuclear power plants create hundreds of thousands of tons of radioactive waste that will continue to be a threat to life for longer than humans will walk the Earth. Even if the problem of radioactive waste could be solved, the recoverable world reserve of fissionable uranium is equivalent to less than 1 1?2 days of the energy striking the Earth from the nuclear reaction of the sun. Oil-fired power plants have all but disappeared in the United States, but oil (mostly diesel fuel and gasoline) powers nearly all our transportation. More than 60 percent of the oil consumed in the United States is now imported. Demand for petroleum will soon exceed world production capacity and at that point the price of fuel will start to rise dramatically. We should be asking ourselves how we will cope with gas prices as they rise from $2.50 to $5 to $10 per gallon and keep rising. It?s hard to imagine the hardship that will be faced by countries that remain addicted to oil, and even harder to imagine the suffering in countries that have oil, but do not have the strength to protect their resources or themselves. Now consider that the entire recoverable world oil reserve is equivalent to the solar energy that strikes the Earth in one day. Biofuels and Hydrogen Before we explore the solar-electric future let?s discuss biofuels and hydrogen as other possible alternatives. Although both have received a lot of good press, I believe neither are viable solutions for our future energy needs. Waste oil and biomass can make good transition fuels but unless human population growth slows, we will need all existing agricultural land to grow food. There are already many examples of food crop land that is being used to create ethanol to power SUVs and other flex-fuel vehicles. The cost of tortillas has quadrupled in Mexico in the last year because of rising demand for corn to make ethanol. If we let demand for biofuels increase, the impact on the world?s poor will be much more severe. According to some studies, it takes 1,000 gallons of water and more than a gallon equivalent of fossil fuel to produce 1 gallon of corn ethanol. Finally, consider that biofuels just aren?t very efficient. When you do the math, the overall efficiency of biomass used as transportation fuel, from sun to wheel, is about 0.01 percent to 0.05 percent. In contrast, the overall efficiency of using solar panels to charge electric vehicles from sun to wheel is 3 percent to 20 percent. This means that solar-charged electric vehicles are from 60 to 2,000 times more efficient than vehicles burning ethanol or biodiesel. Which solution makes more sense? Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are no more efficient than biofuels. Hydrogen is much lighter than air, and it must be contained in order to keep it from escaping the Earth?s atmosphere, unless it is bound up in water or hydrocarbon molecules. The strong bonds that hold these molecules together take a significant amount of energy to break apart to extract hydrogen. Once the hydrogen is extracted, more energy is needed to compress it into a container that is small enough to store on a vehicle. In order for a fuel cell vehicle to go 200 or 300 miles on a tank, the hydrogen must be stored in metal hydrates or at 10,000 psi in heavy containers. Even after more than 20 years of development, fuel cell vehicles still cost more than a million dollars each and don?t last very long or go very far. Finally, it takes about four times more renewable energy to drive a fuel cell vehicle than it does to charge the batteries in an electric vehicle to go the same distance. This is like the difference in fuel economy between a Hummer and a Prius. If you are wondering why hydrogen fuel cell vehicles continue to receive billions of dollars in funding given all these barriers, the fact that 96 percent of all hydrogen is currently extracted from fossil fuels may have something to do with it. There are powerful vested interests controlling our energy policy. Only informed citizens acting together can steer the best course. A Bright Solar-electric Future A solar-electric economy is well within our reach. We?re already generating solar electricity at the utility scale using powerful concentrating solar power technology. We?re also generating electricity through wind energy, which many experts consider an indirect form of solar energy because it?s driven by temperature differences. But also consider that simply incorporating passive solar design strategies (see ?Homes Powered by the Sun,? below), energy efficiency, conservation and other active solar heating strategies in the construction of buildings can save up to 95 percent of the energy used in conventional buildings. With the addition of building- integrated photovoltaics, buildings can be turned into net energy producers. Energy from the sun can be used to power our vehicles, and that includes not only our cars, but also heavy vehicles such as tractors. Electric Vehicles & Plug-in Hybrids. Electric vehicle drivetrains are inherently five to 10 times more efficient than internal combustion engines and they produce no greenhouse gases at the tailpipe. Even if powered by fossil-fuel electricity, emissions at the power plant are much lower per mile traveled than with internal combustion engines. In addition, electric vehicles can be charged directly from renewable sources, thereby eliminating emissions altogether. One of the main excuses the auto industry offers for the lack of electric vehicles is that ?the batteries are not developed yet.? But consider how quickly cell phone batteries developed, transforming mobile phones from heavy, bulky, short-lived nuisances to amazingly light, small and long-lasting necessities. The oil companies are doing a good job of protecting the American consumer from ?dangerous? batteries, but in parts of the world where oil companies have less control, large format battery development is progressing at rapid speeds. Electric Tractors and Agriculture. Experts have estimated that it takes eight to 10 units of fossil energy to put one unit of food energy on American tables, and that it takes the equivalent of 10 barrels of oil to feed each person in the country. Hearing those figures, it?s frightening to imagine what will happen as oil prices rise. To begin with, how would we fuel our farm machinery? The good news is that not only can tractors run on electricity, they run even better on electricity than passenger vehicles do because of their greater weight and slower speeds. An electric tractor can quietly accomplish all the tasks necessary to maintain productivity on a small farm. Dealing with the rising cost of mobility and energy are huge challenges, and the biggest challenge facing humanity may be maintaining an affordable and nourishing food supply. But we can have fresher and more nourishing food without fossil fuels. What it will take is public support for a switch to local food production on small organic farms using solar irrigation pumps and solar-charged electric tractors. We Have the Power It?s easy to feel confused, cynical and even hopeless about the state of the planet these days. But I am excited and optimistic because I know we have the technology now that will allow us to wean ourselves from fossil fuels and move to a renewable solar-electric energy system. Yes, I know???solar panels are still too expensive for many of us. But 10 years ago, nobody gave hybrid cars a chance of succeeding. Today, the Toyota Prius is the hottest thing going. Plug-in hybrids and all-electric options should be available soon. If we all work together and demand that our government set a wise energy policy and use taxes to support the right renewable energy options, I predict we can put the brakes on climate change and enjoy clean, true-green energy. Annual Global RENEWABLE Energy Resources (in Terawatt hours*) Direct Solar Radiation 350,000,000 Wind 200,000 Ocean/Thermal 100,000 Biofuels 50,000 Geothermal 10,000 Tidal/Wave 5,000 The amount of solar energy available each year (yellow circle, Image Gallery) dwarfs supplies of any other source of power, including total reserves of all the fossil fuels on Earth (small circle, Image Gallery). Total Global Non-renewable Energy Resources (Terawatt hours*) Coal 6,000,000 Natural Gas 1,500,000 Uranium 235 1,500,000 Oil 1,000,000 Tar Sands 800,000 Total: 10,800,000 *1 terawatt hour is equal to 1 billion kilowatt hours Homes Powered by the Sun Most of us depend on fossil fuels to keep our homes comfortable by providing heating, cooling and electricity. But surprisingly, it isn?t all that difficult to turn our homes from energy consumers into energy producers. New homes can easily be designed to take advantage of natural heat, light and ventilation; run more efficiently on less electricity; and be fitted with solar panels to produce electricity. Here are a few specific steps that make a big difference: Orient buildings to maximize solar exposure and protect them from prevailing winds. Use wind breaks and berms to channel cold weather around or over buildings. Add insulation to hold heat in winter and exclude heat in summer. Use sunrooms to capture solar energy when needed and vent it when it is not. Take advantage of natural light by using daylighting techniques. Use earth-sheltered building techniques to take advantage of natural heating and cooling provided by stable underground temperatures. Cool homes naturally using convection loops and cooling towers to circulate air. Add thermal mass to buildings by using dense materials, such as brick and stone on interior walls, to maintain more constant temperatures. Design overhangs and plant deciduous vegetation to shade living spaces in the summer but not in the winter. Plant food gardens and edible landscaping to produce more food at your doorstep. Install Energy Star appliances and water saving fixtures to conserve water and energy. Annual World Energy Consumption 1980: 82,919 terawatt hours 2004: 130,971 terawatt hours Projected for 2030: 205,686 terawatt hours Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration Better Living Through Solar Electricity Not only is the potential of solar power enormous, we already have the technology to take advantage of it. We can design our homes for solar heating and wind-powered cooling. Solar electricity can power our homes, our cars and even our tractors. All we have to do is start using it on a wider scale. So what are we waiting for? Contributing editor Steve Heckeroth has built more than two dozen electric vehicles. He?s chair of the American Solar Energy Society?s Renewable Fuels and Transportation Division, and spent the last seven years as director of building-integrated photovoltaic products for the largest flexible thin-film PV manufacturer in the world. His Web site is www.renewables.com. All articles in this Archive are reprinted just as they were originally published; the publication date is shown in the URL address at the top of the page. Source listings, addresses and prices have not been updated; some details may have changed and terminology may be outmoded. In some cases the scanning software used to create the digital articles has introduced typos into the text. In particular, the software often translated fractions incorrectly, i.e. "1/2" now reads as "112". We are working to correct these errors. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.apple-nc.org/pipermail/energy/attachments/20071216/aeb4375b/attachment.html From caver456 at gmail.com Sun Dec 16 19:46:14 2007 From: caver456 at gmail.com (Tom Grundy) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:46:14 -0800 Subject: [Energy] candidates energy chart Message-ID: Another chart on candidates' positions, similar to the one pointed out last month; this one is from Grist; it covers cap-and-trade, mileage standards, renewable, energy, biofuels, coal, and nuclear. The mileage standards column is very out of date with if the current energy bill gets signed, but, it's a good start, with plenty of links to back things up, and snazzy mug-shots. The chart is at: http://www.grist.org/candidate_chart_08.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.apple-nc.org/pipermail/energy/attachments/20071216/59fcf133/attachment.html From caver456 at gmail.com Wed Dec 19 07:06:59 2007 From: caver456 at gmail.com (caver456 at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:06:59 UT Subject: [Energy] A story from Grist.org Message-ID: <200712191506.lBJF6xuR026840@grist2.electricembers.net> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: http://lists.apple-nc.org/pipermail/energy/attachments/20071219/ab2d4ea2/attachment.pl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.apple-nc.org/pipermail/energy/attachments/20071219/ab2d4ea2/attachment.html From caver456 at gmail.com Wed Dec 19 07:11:41 2007 From: caver456 at gmail.com (caver456 at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:11:41 UT Subject: [Energy] A story from Grist.org Message-ID: <200712191511.lBJFBfuR027358@grist2.electricembers.net> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: http://lists.apple-nc.org/pipermail/energy/attachments/20071219/3eca6c80/attachment.pl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.apple-nc.org/pipermail/energy/attachments/20071219/3eca6c80/attachment.html From caver456 at gmail.com Fri Dec 21 11:40:51 2007 From: caver456 at gmail.com (Tom Grundy) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:40:51 -0800 Subject: [Energy] competing RFS laws?? Message-ID: If you thought we were in the twilight zone before, read this regarding the renewable fuel standard that just got signed as a part of the energy bill, versus a weaker dirtier RFS just passed by Senate as a part of the Farm Bill that would trump the energy bill one. Anyone else going cross-eyed yet? -Tom ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Union of Concerned Scientists Action Network Date: Dec 20, 2007 2:39 PM Subject: Time for bioenergy to get smart To: Tom Grundy [image: Smart Bioenergy] * * *Time for Bioenergy to Get Smart* Dear Tom, *Bioenergy?electricity and fuels derived from plant or animal-based materials?is increasingly being touted as a key global warming solution.* If developed in a sustainable way, bioenergy does have the potential to produce both electricity and fuel with fewer risks than those associated with oil, coal, and nuclear technologies. But a rapid global expansion of bioenergy development could have profound negative environmental and economic consequences. If bioenergy is to become a part of our low-carbon future, farmers, producers, policy makers, and consumers will all have to be *smart from the start. * *That is why the Union of Concerned Scientists has launched its new Smart Bioenergy initiative.* No other organization has the scientific expertise to sort through competing options for addressing these complex issues and to translate them into practical, responsible solutions for decision makers and the public. Our engineers and scientists who specialize in agriculture, climate, energy, and vehicles issues are uniquely situated to serve as guides through the lifecycle of bioenergy from seed to sedan. Through our new report, Biofuels: An Important Part of a Low-Carbon Diet, UCS is working to ensure that bioenergy policies throughout the nation include environmental safeguards that prioritize production methods and materials that produce the lowest amount of global warming pollution. In addition, we're highlighting that bioenergy is just one part of the whole solution?it must be pursued in conjunction with increases in energy efficiency, reduced energy demand through conservation, and reforms in transportation and land use policies. The UCS bioenergy principles (pdf) lay out these guiding standards and have been a great tool in our efforts to ensure that the low-carbon fuel standard (pdf) being developed in California becomes a model for the nation. In addition, UCS analysts and advocates in Washington pushed to ensure that the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) in the recently-passed Energy Bill included strong provisions supporting sustainable bioenergy development. Unfortunately, a competing version of the RFS, one stripped of vital environmental safeguards, has been added to the Senate-passed version of the Food and Farm Bill. If this version of the RFS passes and is signed into law, it will trump the stronger RFS signed by the president earlier this week. *Please urge your representativeto support a smart Renewable Fuel Standard that protects our air, soil, and water and significantly reduces global warming pollution.* The RFS included in the Energy Bill?not the Senate Food and Food and Farm Bill?represents a positive first step for bioenergy to play a real role in America's global warming solution. We hope you will join us in this important new initiative, * *Kate Abend, Climate Program Ben Larson, Clean Energy Program Scott Nathanson, Clean Vehicles Program Jennifer Palembas, Food and Environment Program Erin Rogers, California Climate Program If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for the Union of Concerned Scientists . ------------------------------ This message was sent to caver456 at gmail.com. Visit your subscription management pageto update your personal profile. From this page you can change your email address, mailing address, name, congressional districts, email format preference, or add or remove yourself from various UCS newsletters, networks, and mailing lists. To stop receiving UCS Action Network emails, click to unsubscribe. The Union of Concerned Scientists relies on individuals like you to support our research and advocacy. Join us to promote practical, science-based environmental and security solutions. To ensure you continue to receive emails from UCS, be sure to add action at ucsusa.org to your address book. If you have general questions, comments or concerns about this action, send email to ucsaction at ucsusa.org We are committed to protecting your privacy, your email address will NEVER be sold or exchanged. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.apple-nc.org/pipermail/energy/attachments/20071221/381dd668/attachment.html From caver456 at gmail.com Thu Dec 27 16:08:47 2007 From: caver456 at gmail.com (Tom Grundy) Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:08:47 -0800 Subject: [Energy] Berkeley Peak Oil Resolution Message-ID: Add to the list: Berkeley just passed a peak oil resolution last week http://postcarboncities.net/node/2194 -Tom -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.apple-nc.org/pipermail/energy/attachments/20071227/d0514016/attachment.html